Call Now (469) 708-0005

Is Virtual Reality Effective in Orthopedic Rehabilitation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Last updated: 04-15-2020

Read original article here

Is Virtual Reality Effective in Orthopedic Rehabilitation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Is Virtual Reality Effective in Orthopedic Rehabilitation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Mohammed Gumaa
Department of Physical Therapy for Musculoskeletal Disorders and Its Surgery, Cairo University
, Cairo,
Department of Physical Therapy for Musculoskeletal Disorders and Its Surgery, Cairo University
, 24 Mohammed Korium St, 6th District, Nasr City, Cairo,
Egypt
Address all correspondence to Dr Rehan Youssef at: aliaa.rehan@gmail.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Physical Therapy, Volume 99, Issue 10, October 2019, Pages 1304–1325, https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzz093
Published:
Cite
Citation
Mohammed Gumaa, Aliaa Rehan Youssef, Is Virtual Reality Effective in Orthopedic Rehabilitation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Physical Therapy, Volume 99, Issue 10, October 2019, Pages 1304–1325, https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzz093
Download citation file:
Abstract
Background
Virtual reality (VR) is an interactive technology that allows customized treatment and may help in delivering effective person-centered rehabilitation.
Purpose
The purpose of this review was to systematically review and critically appraise the controlled clinical trials that investigated VR effectiveness in orthopedic rehabilitation.
Data Sources
Pubmed, CINAHL, Embase, PEDro, REHABDATA, and Sage publications were searched up to September 2018. In addition, manual searching and snowballing using Scopus and Web of Science were done.
Study Selection
Two reviewers screened studies for eligibility first by title and abstract and then full text.
Data Extraction
Articles were categorized into general or region-specific (upper limbs, lower limbs, and spine) orthopedic disorders. Study quality was assessed using the Evaluation Guidelines for Rating the Quality of an Intervention Study scoring. Meta-analysis quantified VR effectiveness, compared with no treatment, in back pain.
Data Synthesis
Nineteen studies were included in the quality assessment. The majority of the studies were of moderate quality. Fourteen studies showed that VR did not differ compared with exercises. Compared with the no-treatment control, 5 studies favored VR and 3 other studies showed no differences. For low back pain, the meta-analysis revealed no significant difference between VR and no-treatment control (n = 116; standardized mean difference = −0.21; 95% confidence interval = −0.58 to 0.15).
Limitations
Limitations included heterogeneity in interventions and the outcome measures of reviewed studies. Only articles in English were included.
Conclusion
The evidence of VR effectiveness is promising in chronic neck pain and shoulder impingement syndrome. VR and exercises have similar effects in rheumatoid arthritis, knee arthritis, ankle instability, and post-anterior cruciate reconstruction. For fibromyalgia and back pain, as well as after knee arthroplasty, the evidence of VR effectiveness compared with exercise is absent or inconclusive.
© 2019 American Physical Therapy Association
This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model )
Issue Section:


Read the rest of this article here